Хватит параноидальностью страдать. Я всего лишь дал человеку информацию, если что - пусть обращается.Санитары, уведите его отсюда! Тут речь не о авторстве идей, а вопросах, которые Тустеп будет поднимать на ЦСМ7. Псих, эта тема не для выпендрежа в стиле "я это первый написал".
Донат На хостинг |
ISK за переводы до 75kk за 1000зн. |
Хроники EVE Сборник |
Новичкам Полезная информация |

Two step for CSM 7 (Two step для CSM 7)
#21
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 15:56

#22
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 15:59

I was personally proposing such an idea on the forums. I do not know if someone mentioned something like that before. So I would assume it was initially my idea. I could post an in-depth version if needed.
Here it is in russian: http://forum.eve-ru....2
I heard it from one of my corp members, but maybe it came from you originally. I'm happy to hear *any* good ideas, no matter the source and present them to CCP. That is why it is important that I talk to you guys directly, which I should have done last year (though I did have Kirian to pass on important info).
#24
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 17:27

Btw, Two, are u going to support new features CCP wanna bring? I mean a topic on offorum `bout ..mm.."new items you want to see in eve".. `bout scripts for stasis webs\ hictor bubbles and so on
New features that make sense, of course. Some of the ideas that CCP has are very bad...
What would you like to see a stasis web script do? Trade range for web amount?
Hictors already have scripts, what would you like to see changed?
#25
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 18:07

I have sent you a private message on the forum. Feel free to contact me if there is any need.I heard it from one of my corp members, but maybe it came from you originally. I'm happy to hear *any* good ideas, no matter the source and present them to CCP. That is why it is important that I talk to you guys directly, which I should have done last year (though I did have Kirian to pass on important info).
And do you have any ideas about the future development of the W-Space? Not just adding new sites and randomizing spawns, but some vision for the future?
Сообщение отредактировал Psihius: 10 February 2012 - 18:10
#26
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 18:51

I have sent you a private message on the forum. Feel free to contact me if there is any need.
And do you have any ideas about the future development of the W-Space? Not just adding new sites and randomizing spawns, but some vision for the future?
I think Google translate does a good enough job for me to understand your post about Self Destruct.
CCP isn't currently planning on any major w-space expansion, mostly because w-space is one of the few areas of the game that current isn't broken in some way. Hopefully after they address the major issues in nullsec and lowsec they will spend some time on wormholes.
#28
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 20:17

Чтоб не фармили 3 дня дореспы, четко зная кто триггер в волне. Наверное. Стартовый респ вроде бы можно и не выносить совсем, только гвардов.Зачем рандом в спаунах слиперов? (оттанковать нет проблем же, так к чему?)
Сообщение отредактировал L'ecran: 10 February 2012 - 20:18
На еве-ру нет места лжи, ненависти и некачественному постингу - надеюсь, это ты запомнишь.
Это частный ресурс, тут нет никакой справедливости, несмотря на то, что про неё тут много пишут, тут предвзятое модерирование, тут всем плевать на правила, если есть какой-то интерес или профит. Бороться за правду на этом форуме не имеет смысла.
#31
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 20:54

Ребят можно попросить перевести 18 пост .. не силен в албанском на столько некоторые пункты не совсем понятны
зарание спс
...
Да это все уже выше было, только не так по пунктам разложено:
1. Объем щита, когда шип достали из ShipMaintArray/вступили во флот/прыгнули в пульсар.
2. Что-то лучшее, чем пароль на ПОСы для доступа (что-то по аналогии с настройками каналов чата хотя бы)
3. Разрешить в вх CapShipMaintArray - негде хранить кучу капшипов.
4. Конты в корпангарах - иметь возможность переименовывать, открывать, складывать в них хлам. Неплохо бы еще репакать хлам в корпангарах.
5. Иметь возможность переименовывать все структуры ПОСа (даже корпангары и ShipMaintArrays)
6. Добавить рандом в респы слиперов по аналогии с Инкуршенами (хотя бы рандомные триггеры)
7. Не менять ID сигнатур после ДТ
8. СТаймер селфдистракта на капах - один из вариантов предложений, которые он слышал, это не давать возможности включить харды если активирован селфдестракт.
9. Дать возможность менять подсистемы т3 на ПОСе (ему лично пофиг, но многие просят)
10. Больше дырок! Сейчас 5-ки и 6-ки имеют одну статику и это скучно, пусть будет парочка статических дырок например.
Сообщение отредактировал Naimas Alvares: 10 February 2012 - 20:56
#32
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 21:14

С шилдами разве уже не все в порядке?
Зачем рандом в спаунах слиперов? (оттанковать нет проблем же, так к чему?)
I think Google translate is doing a bad job on your post.
The first question is about shields, I assume you are talking about my request to fix boarding shield ships, as well as jumping into pulsars and joining fleets. All of those things will no longer make your shields drop below the level they were, which is a good thing.
The reason for random sleeper spawns is to make killing them a little less boring. Right now, AHARM (and I am sure most of you), have killing them down to a science. We know exactly which ones we need to kill first, and exactly which ships to expect at each site. This is bad, and makes PVE boring.
I don't understand L'ecran's first comment.
Thanks to Alvares for translating my list.
#34
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 21:37

I think there is no way to make farming process less boring. Farming- is a hard work to buy our expensive toys. Make it less predictable.. I see no reason. i think i ll find the way to do it fast and effective even if spawn will be randomized

About ur election program. I think it will be good idea to compilate ur opinions about wh space questions in one post, called "election thesises" or smth, and post it here.
We have people to translate this. We have much more people to discuss this.
Blog post not so good for voting choice.
Sorry about my english, i hope it not worse, than google translater.
#36
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 23:45

He wants to vote for russian pilot if he'll find good one.
I don't think there is a Russian wormhole guy running. Would you rather have a Russian 0.0 guy or a wormhole guy on the CSM?
Lecran told the same, about boring process of farming.
I think there is no way to make farming process less boring. Farming- is a hard work to buy our expensive toys. Make it less predictable.. I see no reason. i think i ll find the way to do it fast and effective even if spawn will be randomized
About ur election program. I think it will be good idea to compilate ur opinions about wh space questions in one post, called "election thesises" or smth, and post it here.
We have people to translate this. We have much more people to discuss this.
Blog post not so good for voting choice.
Sorry about my english, i hope it not worse, than google translater.
Your English is way better than my Russian

My main opinion about w-space is that is it great! All I want CCP to do is fix things like POSes, and then continue to *expand* wormhole space. I want to see Class 7 wormholes!
how about continue backstory @wormholes?
where came sliepers drons?
what happened talocan's race?
and nice project Arek’Jaalan
it would be nice if ccp can start this story
I am not super into the roleplaying stuff, but lots of people are, and for them, I would love to see CCP continue the wormhole backstory. If you have read the new EVE novel about DUST, there is more stuff about sleepers there, so hopefully CCP will continue to expand things.
#37
Отправлено 10 February 2012 - 23:52

Не надо тут за меня отчитываться и смягчать мои комментарии.He wants to vote for russian pilot if he'll find good one.

Телепаты, етить.
На еве-ру нет места лжи, ненависти и некачественному постингу - надеюсь, это ты запомнишь.
Это частный ресурс, тут нет никакой справедливости, несмотря на то, что про неё тут много пишут, тут предвзятое модерирование, тут всем плевать на правила, если есть какой-то интерес или профит. Бороться за правду на этом форуме не имеет смысла.
#40
Crysalis*Нейтрал
Отправлено 11 February 2012 - 9:08

heheMy main opinion about w-space is that is it great! All I want CCP to do is fix things like POSes, and then continue to *expand* wormhole space. I want to see Class 7 wormholes!
we dont need static anymore!
we need always random holes

it would be interesting and add @wormholes more unknown

I am not super into the roleplaying stuff, but lots of people are, and for them, I would love to see CCP continue the wormhole backstory. If you have read the new EVE novel about DUST, there is more stuff about sleepers there, so hopefully CCP will continue to expand things.

1 посетителей читают тему
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users